Peer Review Policy

Ethnic and Technology Management Journal (ETMJ) implements a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality and reliability of each article published. This process aims to provide a trusted platform for researchers to share their latest research findings and insights in the field of nursing.

  1. Characteristics of Peer Review:

    • Each submitted article is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field of the article's topic.
    • The identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential (double-blind review) to avoid bias in the evaluation process.
    • Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, experience, and contributions to the scientific community.

  2. Evaluation Criteria:

    • The originality and scientific contribution of the work.
    • The strength of the research methodology and its relevance to the discussed topic.
    • The clarity and accuracy of the interpretation of results.
    • The contribution to the development of thought and practice in the nursing field.

  3. Editorial Decisions:

    • The editor is responsible for making editorial decisions based on the peer review evaluations.
    • Decisions may include: acceptance without revision, acceptance with minor/major revisions, or rejection.
    • Authors will receive constructive feedback to improve their article if needed.

  4. Commitment to Quality:

    • We are committed to maintaining high standards in our peer review process.
    • We value the constructive contributions of reviewers who help improve the quality of published articles.
    • We offer support to authors to ensure the publication of high-quality articles that are beneficial to the scientific community and practitioners.